Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the objections to the notice as time-barred had to be decided by the assessing authority before passing the final assessment order.
Analysis: The appeal arose from a grievance that the assessing authority had not decided the petitioner's representation objecting to the notice on limitation grounds. The Court treated the expectation recorded by the earlier order as a binding direction and required the assessing authority to first decide the objections by a speaking order. It was further directed that no final assessment order should be passed until the objections were so decided.
Conclusion: The assessing authority was directed to decide the petitioner's objections/representation by a speaking order before proceeding with the assessment.
Final Conclusion: The matter was disposed of with a direction to the assessing authority to decide the limitation objection first and only thereafter proceed further, if necessary.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a taxpayer's objection to the notice is pending, the assessing authority must decide it by a speaking order before making the final assessment.