TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court upholds Competent Authority's acquisition based on fair market value, dismisses appeal under s. 269H.</h1> The court dismissed the appeal under s. 269H of the I.T. Act, 1961, against the judgment of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The Competent Authority's ... Assessment, Firm Issues:1. Appeal under s. 269H of the I.T. Act, 1961 against the judgment of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal.2. Determination of fair market value of a house for acquisition proceedings under s. 269F(6).3. Validity of proceedings initiated by the Competent Authority.4. Application of valuation methods in determining fair market value.Analysis:1. The appellant filed an appeal under s. 269H of the I.T. Act, 1961 against the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal's judgment. The Competent Authority initiated acquisition proceedings as the fair market value of the house exceeded the apparent consideration by more than 15%, indicating potential income tax evasion.2. The Competent Authority relied on reports from an I.T. inspector and a Valuation Officer to determine the fair market value of the house. The Competent Authority found that all conditions under s. 269F(6) were met, leading to the acquisition order. The Tribunal upheld this decision, prompting the appellant's appeal.3. The appellant argued that the Competent Authority's proceedings were void due to premature service of notices. However, the court held that such service did not invalidate the proceedings as there was no statutory requirement for personal service before publication in the Official Gazette.4. Regarding valuation methods, the appellant contended that the Competent Authority should have considered the rental value of the house. However, the court found the Competent Authority's use of the land and building method appropriate. The court emphasized that the rental method was not the sole basis for valuation and that the Competent Authority's valuation was fair and correct based on available evidence.5. The court dismissed the appeal, stating that the question raised did not involve a point of law. The court affirmed the Competent Authority's valuation methodology and upheld the acquisition proceedings. The appellant's arguments regarding valuation methods were deemed unsubstantiated, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with costs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
