Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for freight and other payments was sustainable where tax was deducted in February 2007 but deposited in May 2007, and whether the Finance Act, 2010 amendment to section 40(a)(ia) applied retrospectively.
Analysis: The disallowance turned on the effect of the amended proviso to section 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal followed the jurisdictional High Court ruling that the amendment brought by the Finance Act, 2010 was remedial and curative in nature and therefore operated retrospectively. On the undisputed facts, the tax deducted at source had been paid before the due date for filing the return under section 139(1), so the statutory condition for disallowance was not attracted.
Conclusion: The disallowance was not sustainable and the assessee was entitled to the deduction.