Penalty for Interest Disallowance Upheld by Tribunal in Income Tax Case The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Penalty for Interest Disallowance Upheld by Tribunal in Income Tax Case
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2007-08. The penalty was related to disallowance of interest on diversion of interest-bearing funds to a sister concern. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided complete particulars of income and expenditure, and the mere disallowance of interest did not justify the penalty under section 271(1)(c). Therefore, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed by the Tribunal.
Issues involved: Appeal against penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 relating to assessment year 2007-08.
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance of interest on diversion of interest bearing fund to sister concern:
The Assessing Officer made additions for disallowance of interest under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act on interest-free advances and restricted deduction under section 80IC. A penalty of &8377; 4,65,544 was levied u/s 271(1)(c) on these additions. The CIT (Appeals) deleted the penalty on interest disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) but upheld it on deduction disallowance under section 80IC. The Revenue appealed against the deletion of penalty on interest disallowance related to diversion of funds to a sister concern. Despite the absence of the assessee, the Tribunal found that complete particulars of income and expenditure were provided, and the Revenue failed to prove inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee that mere disallowance of interest does not justify penalty u/s 271(1)(c). Consequently, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed.
Judges' Names: Shri T.R. Sood, Accountant Member and Ms. Sushma Chowla, Judicial Member
Decision: The appeal of the Revenue against the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was dismissed by the Tribunal on the grounds that the assessee had provided complete particulars of income and expenditure, and the disallowance of interest did not warrant the imposition of the penalty.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
