Rash and negligent conduct, not murder, applies where the record shows no intention to cause death.

Section 304A applies where death is caused by rash or negligent conduct and the facts do not show intention to cause death or knowledge that death was a probable consequence. The text distinguishes this from culpable homicide and murder under Sections 299 and 300, noting that a mere error of judgment is insufficient for the graver charge. Where the material indicates negligent driving and no intent to kill, the proper offence is rash and negligent conduct rather than Section 302. It also notes that charges may be altered later if the record so justifies, and states that the charge was altered to Section 304A with allied traffic and hurt offences.

---

---

Issues: Whether the material on record disclosed an offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, or only a rash and negligent act attracting Section 304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, with the charges being altered accordingly.

Analysis: Section 304A applies where death is caused by a rash or negligent act and the act does not amount to culpable homicide under Sections 299 or 300 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The decisive elements are rashness and negligence, and the provision is confined to cases where there is no intention to cause death and no knowledge that death was a probable consequence. A mere error of judgment is not enough to sustain the graver charge. Where the facts indicate absence of intention to kill and the case essentially involves negligent driving, the proper offence is one of rash and negligent conduct rather than murder or culpable homicide. The Court also noted that charges may be altered at a later stage if the material so warrants.

Conclusion: The charge under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, was found inapplicable, and the charges were altered to Section 304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, along with Sections 279 and 337 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in favour of the appellant.

---