Investigating agency discretion in arrest and charge-sheet filing cannot be overridden by court direction during investigation.

During investigation, arrest remains within the investigating officer's statutory discretion and the court cannot compel immediate arrest merely because anticipatory bail was refused. The police also retain control over the form and content of the final report, and neither the High Court nor the Magistrate can direct the agency to file a charge-sheet or adopt a particular conclusion before the report is submitted. The impugned directions were therefore unsustainable and were set aside, leaving the investigating agency free to complete the investigation and proceed according to law.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the High Court could direct the investigating agency to arrest the accused during the pendency of investigation; (ii) Whether the High Court could direct the investigating agency to file a charge-sheet or submit a report in a particular manner.

Issue (i): Whether the High Court could direct the investigating agency to arrest the accused during the pendency of investigation.

Analysis: Arrest is a component of investigation and lies within the discretion of the investigating officer. The power to arrest under the criminal procedure law is discretionary and must be exercised with caution depending on the facts, nature of the offence, and the course of investigation. Rejection of anticipatory bail does not by itself compel immediate arrest. The High Court, therefore, could not substitute its view for that of the investigating officer at the investigation stage.

Conclusion: The direction compelling arrest was unsustainable and was set aside.

Issue (ii): Whether the High Court could direct the investigating agency to file a charge-sheet or submit a report in a particular manner.

Analysis: The investigative function remains within the exclusive domain of the police until the matter reaches the Magistrate. After investigation, the agency may submit a report supporting the allegations or a final report exonerating the accused. The Magistrate may accept the report, direct further investigation where legally permissible, or take cognizance, but neither the Magistrate nor the High Court can compel the police to file a charge-sheet or to adopt a conclusion dictated by the court. Such a direction amounts to unwarranted interference with the statutory power of investigation.

Conclusion: The direction requiring submission of a charge-sheet was unsustainable and was set aside.

Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded, and the impugned directions interfering with arrest and the course of investigation were annulled while leaving the investigating agency free to complete the investigation and submit its own report in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi: During investigation, the court cannot compel arrest or require the police to submit a charge-sheet, because arrest and the form of the final police report lie within the statutory discretion of the investigating agency, subject to the Magistrate's lawful powers after submission of the report.

---