Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>High Court directs Tribunal to reconsider tax rate for long-term capital gains in block assessments.</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Income-tax Versus Smt. Chandra Balakrishnan</h3> The High Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the rate of tax applicable to long-term capital gains in block assessments under section 158BC of the ... - Issues:1. Determination of the rate of tax on capital gains in a block assessment under section 158BC of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. Inclusion of income below the taxable limit in the undisclosed income for the block period.Issue 1: Determination of the Rate of Tax on Capital Gains:The judgment involves two separate cases where the Revenue appealed regarding the rate of tax on capital gains in block assessments under section 158BC of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal's decision in both cases was influenced by an earlier decision and a miscellaneous petition. The primary question revolved around whether the long-term capital gains from property sales should be taxed at 20% under section 112(1)(a)(ii) or 60% under section 113 of the Act. The Tribunal initially ruled in favor of the 20% rate, which was agreed upon by the Departmental representative. However, the Revenue contended that the rate should be 60%. The High Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the rate of tax applicable to long-term capital gains in block assessments, as it was not adequately addressed in the previous orders due to the agreement made before the Tribunal.Issue 2: Inclusion of Income Below Taxable Limit in Undisclosed Income:The second issue pertains to whether income below the taxable limit for any assessment year covered by the block period should be included in the undisclosed income. A previous judgment clarified that undisclosed income below the taxable limit is not liable to be included in the undisclosed income for the block period. In line with this precedent, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, emphasizing that the Tribunal should focus solely on determining the rate of tax applicable to capital gains in block assessments under section 158BC of the Act.In conclusion, the High Court's judgment addressed the issues of determining the rate of tax on capital gains in block assessments and the inclusion of income below the taxable limit in undisclosed income for the block period. The Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the rate of tax for long-term capital gains and confirmed that income below the taxable limit should not be part of the undisclosed income.