Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition challenging a show cause notice ought to be entertained, or whether the petitioners should be permitted to raise the jurisdictional objection before the adjudicating authority in the first instance.
Analysis: The notice under Section 51 of the Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1973 was only a show cause notice. In view of that procedural stage, the petitioners were granted liberty to raise the jurisdictional objection as a preliminary issue before the adjudicating authority, and the authority was directed to decide that issue. The questions of delay and laches were expressly left open.
Conclusion: The writ petition was not decided on merits and the petitioners were relegated to the adjudicating authority to pursue the jurisdictional objection at the preliminary stage.