Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (4) TMI 1742 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal dismisses procedural error, reverses interest disallowance, remits corporate guarantee issues for reassessment. The tribunal dismissed the procedural mistake regarding the draft assessment order, deleted the disallowance of interest on sham transactions, and ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal dismisses procedural error, reverses interest disallowance, remits corporate guarantee issues for reassessment.

                          The tribunal dismissed the procedural mistake regarding the draft assessment order, deleted the disallowance of interest on sham transactions, and remitted the issues related to corporate guarantee and payments to Silver Point Infratech Ltd. back to the Assessing Officer for further verification and appropriate action.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Issuance of Draft Assessment Order
                          2. Adjustment for Corporate Guarantee
                          3. Disallowance of Interest on Sham Transactions
                          4. Disallowance of Interest on Payments to Silver Point Infratech Ltd.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Issuance of Draft Assessment Order:
                          The assessee contended that the Assessing Officer (AO) erred in not issuing a Draft Assessment Order as per the procedure laid down under section 144C(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The AO issued a notice of demand under section 156 and penalty notices under sections 271(1)(c) and 271AAB along with the draft assessment order dated 30/12/2016, which the assessee argued amounted to passing a final assessment order. The tribunal noted that the AO had indeed passed a draft assessment order but accompanied it with procedural notices. The tribunal held that the procedural mistakes did not amount to passing a final assessment order, and therefore, the ground raised by the assessee was dismissed.

                          2. Adjustment for Corporate Guarantee:
                          The assessee argued that the corporate guarantee provided to its Associate Enterprise (AE) did not fall within the scope of an international transaction under section 92B and that the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) had incorrectly adopted the State Bank of India (SBI) rates for determining the Arm's Length Price (ALP). The tribunal noted that the term 'guarantee' was included in the definition of international transactions by the Finance Act, 2012, with retrospective effect from 01/04/2002. The tribunal agreed that the corporate guarantee should be considered an international transaction. However, the tribunal found that the TPO should have applied a rate of 0.53% as per the decision in Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and remitted the issue back to the TPO/AO to determine the actual exposure of contingent liability for the assessment year and apply the appropriate rate.

                          3. Disallowance of Interest on Sham Transactions:
                          The AO disallowed interest expenses amounting to Rs. 27,94,43,971/- on the grounds that the transactions with related parties were sham. The assessee argued that the transactions were genuine and entered into during the regular course of business. The tribunal observed that the AO had not rejected any purchases or made any inquiry to find the fair market value of transactions but proceeded to disallow the associated financial cost. The tribunal found that the AO's method of calculating interest was improper and noted that the assessee had made a margin of Rs. 2.34 crores in the transactions, which was enough to cover the interest cost. The tribunal held that since the AO accepted the turnover without disallowing any purchases, he could not disallow the interest cost. Therefore, the disallowance made by the AO on interest was deleted.

                          4. Disallowance of Interest on Payments to Silver Point Infratech Ltd.:
                          The AO disallowed interest of Rs. 1,37,88,369/- on payments made to Silver Point Infratech Ltd., arguing that the assessee used borrowed funds for these payments without any business prudence. The assessee contended that the payments were part of commercial transactions and back-to-back payments from contractors to sub-contractors. The tribunal noted that the information provided by the assessee was not verified by the tax authorities. The tribunal remitted the issue back to the AO to verify the claim and determine if the payments were indeed back-to-back payments. If verified, the addition on interest should be deleted, and the assessee should be given a proper opportunity of being heard.

                          Conclusion:
                          The tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the issues related to corporate guarantee and payments to Silver Point Infratech Ltd. back to the AO for further verification and appropriate action. The disallowance of interest on sham transactions was deleted, and the procedural mistake regarding the draft assessment order was dismissed.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found