TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court upholds validity of Finance Act sections, petitioner plans special leave petition</h1> <h3>Ladam Homes Limited Versus Union of India And ors.</h3> The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the validity of Sections 65(105)(zzq) and 65(105)(zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the ... - Issues involved: Challenge to the validity of Sections 65(105)(zzq) and 65(105)(zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2010 under Articles 14, 246, and 265 of the Constitution of India and Section 66 of the Finance Act.The petitioner filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that Sections 65(105)(zzq) and 65(105)(zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2010 are null and void and violative of constitutional provisions. The petitioner challenged the validity of these sections under Articles 14, 246, and 265 of the Constitution of India and as ultra vires of Section 66 of the Finance Act.The High Court noted that the controversy raised in this petition was already addressed in a judgment dated 19th/20th January, 2012, by another Division Bench of the Court in a related case (Writ Petition No.1456 of 2010 and cognate petitions). In line with the previous decision, the present petition was also dismissed.Following the dismissal of the petition, the petitioner's counsel indicated that the service tax liability would be discharged under protest and without prejudice to their rights and contentions. The petitioner planned to file a special leave petition to challenge the High Court's decision.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
