TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Challenges in Service Tax Payment Rules and Construction Projects</h1> <h3>M/s GPL Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Lucknow</h3> M/s GPL Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Lucknow - TMI Issues involved:1. Service Tax payment basis - receipt vs. invoice2. Applicability of Point of Taxation Rules, 20113. Payment schedule in construction of residential complex4. Verification of Service Tax payment on components received after due date5. Remand to Original Adjudicating AuthorityIssue 1: Service Tax payment basis - receipt vs. invoiceThe appellant was initially paying Service Tax based on receipt but, as per Point of Taxation Rules, 2011, was required to pay based on invoice from 01/07/2011. In a construction project, invoices were not raised independently, and payments were scheduled between the purchaser and the service provider. The Revenue alleged that Service Tax should be paid as per the payment schedule, resulting in a confirmation of Service Tax and a penalty. The appellant argued that they paid the Service Tax upon receiving payments from purchasers, hence no short payment occurred.Issue 2: Applicability of Point of Taxation Rules, 2011The case delves into the application of the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011, which mandated the appellant to pay Service Tax based on invoices from a specific date. The conflict arose due to the nature of the construction project where invoices were not raised independently, leading to a dispute regarding the timing of Service Tax payment.Issue 3: Payment schedule in construction of residential complexIn the trade of construction of residential complexes, a payment schedule was agreed upon between the purchaser and the service provider. This payment arrangement raised questions regarding the appropriate timing for Service Tax payment, as invoices were not issued separately but were linked to the payment schedule.Issue 4: Verification of Service Tax payment on components received after due dateThe Tribunal highlighted the need to verify whether the Service Tax was paid on components received after the due date. This verification was deemed necessary to ascertain if the appellant had indeed paid the Service Tax on all components in accordance with the prescribed rules.Issue 5: Remand to Original Adjudicating AuthorityThe Tribunal decided to remand the matter to the Original Adjudicating Authority for further verification on the payment of Service Tax on components received after the due date. The Authority was directed to reconsider the case, specifically focusing on the payment of interest on such components. The decision to remand the case was made with all issues left open for the Authority to address comprehensively.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
