TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT Dismisses Appeal on Stock Valuation & Disallowance</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - IV Versus URMIN PRODUCTS PVT LTD</h3> The appeal under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the ITAT order for the assessment year 2006-2007 was dismissed. The issues revolved ... - Issues involved: Appeal u/s 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against ITAT order for assessment year 2006-2007. Questions of law regarding deletion of addition on account of valuation of closing stock and disallowance under Section 36(1)(va) of the Act.Valuation of Closing Stock: The Assessing Officer added Rs. 15 Lacs to the total income of the assessee due to lack of basis provided on valuation for perfumes. However, CIT (Appeals) deleted the additions based on the assessee's maintained records and evidence. The Tribunal upheld this decision, noting that no appeal was made by Revenue against the CIT (A) order for the previous year, and there were no changes in facts or circumstances. The Tribunal found no error in the CIT (A) findings, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.Disallowance under Section 36(1)(va): The disallowance of Rs. 78,790 under Section 36(1)(va) of the Act, related to the Employees Contribution Fund. The Assessing Officer disallowed it due to delayed payment, considering it as the employer's income. However, CIT (A) disagreed and the Tribunal, following the decision of the Delhi High Court, upheld the CIT (A) findings. The Court found no error in the Tribunal's approach and dismissed the appeal, as no question of law arose for consideration.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
