TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Revenue's Appeal Allowed Over Assessee's Accounts Rejection under IT Act Section 145(3)</h1> <h3>A.C.I.T., Circle 3 (1), Gwalior Versus Shri Jagdish Pd. Bansal, Shivpuri (M.P.) And Vice-Versa.</h3> The Revenue's appeal against the CIT(A)'s decision to reject the assessee's accounts under section 145(3) of the IT Act was allowed, reinstating the AO's ... - Issues involved:The judgment involves issues related to rejection of accounts u/s. 145(3) of the IT Act and the computation of income based on profit rate.Rejection of accounts u/s. 145(3) of the IT Act:The AO rejected the books of account of the assessee due to lack of supporting bills and vouchers for claimed expenditures, leading to estimation of income at a higher rate. The ld. CIT(A) found the rejection unjustified as no specific defects were mentioned in the audit report. However, since the assessee failed to produce complete bills and vouchers, the rejection was deemed justified. The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s decision, which was allowed, restoring the AO's order.Computation of income based on profit rate:The AO applied a profit rate of 12.5% initially, which was reduced to 6% by the ld. CIT(A) considering the history of the assessee and comparable cases. The Revenue challenged the reduction, but the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that the 6% profit rate was fair and reasonable given the lack of complete supporting documents. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross-objection.In conclusion, the departmental appeal was partly allowed, and the cross objection of the assessee was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
