Challenging Bank Account Freezing Orders: Understanding Appeal Process under Customs Act

The High Court of Madhya Pradesh considered a writ petition challenging orders freezing bank accounts under the Customs Act, 1962. The court emphasized the appealable nature of such orders under Section 128 of the Act, granting liberty to prefer an appeal within the specified timeline and allowing for an extension in certain circumstances. The judgment underscores the importance of following the statutory appeal process and ensuring parties have the opportunity to seek redressal through appropriate legal avenues.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to order freezing bank accounts under the Customs Act, 1962.

Analysis:
The High Court of Madhya Pradesh heard a writ petition challenging the order dated 18-05-2016 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner of Customs (Export) I.C.D. Tughlakabad, New Delhi, along with the order dated 05-04-2016 issued by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence freezing certain companies' bank accounts. The respondent's counsel argued that the impugned orders are appealable under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962. Section 128 allows any person aggrieved by a decision or order passed by a customs officer lower in rank than a Commissioner of Customs to appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) within sixty days from the date of communication of the decision or order. The provision also permits the Commissioner (Appeals) to grant further time for filing an appeal if sufficient cause is shown. The court, considering the appealable nature of the order, granted liberty to prefer an appeal in accordance with the law, and directed the issuance of a certified copy as per rules.

This judgment primarily revolves around the appealability of orders issued under the Customs Act, 1962, specifically focusing on freezing bank accounts. The court emphasized the importance of following the statutory appeal process outlined in Section 128 of the Act, highlighting the specific timeline for filing appeals and the discretion granted to the Commissioner (Appeals) to extend the period in case of sufficient cause. By granting liberty to prefer an appeal, the court ensured that the parties could seek redressal through the appropriate legal channels, underscoring the significance of adhering to the statutory framework for challenging customs-related decisions.

---