TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court condones appeal delay, rules in favor of Assessee on Advertising expenses under Income Tax Act.</h1> <h3>THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 Versus HONDA SEIL POWER PRODUCTS LTD.</h3> THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 Versus HONDA SEIL POWER PRODUCTS LTD. - TMI Issues:1. Delay in re-filing the appeal2. Grounds raised by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961Analysis:1. The judgment addressed an application concerning a delay of 38 days in re-filing the appeal, which was allowed by the court. The delay was condoned, and the application was disposed of.2. The appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, involved two grounds raised by the Revenue against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for the Assessment Year 2011-12. The first issue related to Advertising, Marketing, and Promotion expenses, which were decided in favor of the Assessee based on a previous decision in the Assessee's own case. The court referred to the decision in Honda Seil Power Products Ltd. v. Dy CIT (2016) 237 Taxman 304 for AY 2008-09 to support this conclusion.3. The second question raised in the appeal concerned the provision for service coupons, which the ITAT found to have been made on a scientific basis. The court noted that there was no substantial question of law arising from this issue. As a result, the appeal was dismissed by the court.This comprehensive analysis covers the issues of delay in re-filing the appeal and the grounds raised by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, providing a detailed overview of the judgment delivered by the Delhi High Court.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
