Tribunal allows assessee's appeals for charitable income, dismisses Revenue's appeals on exemptions and depreciation.

The tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals for the assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08, permitting the application of income for charitable purposes and the deemed application under Section 11(1) Explanation 2. Additionally, the tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on eligibility for exemptions under Sections 11 and 12, deletion of additions, and allowance of depreciation on assets.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Denial of application of income for charitable purposes.
2. Denial of deemed application under Section 11(1) Explanation 2 of the Income Tax Act.
3. Eligibility for exemption under Sections 11 and 12.
4. Deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer.
5. Allowance of depreciation on assets.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Denial of Application of Income for Charitable Purposes:

The assessee argued that advances made for charitable purposes should be considered as an application of income. The Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) denied this claim. However, the tribunal found that the advances were indeed made for charitable purposes, and the evidence supported this. The tribunal concluded that the AO and CIT(A) were incorrect in denying the application of income for these advances, thus allowing the assessee's appeal on this ground.

2. Denial of Deemed Application under Section 11(1) Explanation 2:

The assessee claimed deemed application of unrealized income, which was denied by the CIT(A) because the intimation was not filed with the original return but with the revised return. The tribunal held that there is no bar under Section 139(5) for filing intimation with the revised return. Therefore, the tribunal allowed the assessee's claim for deemed application of income.

3. Eligibility for Exemption under Sections 11 and 12:

The Revenue contended that the assessee was engaged in commercial activities and thus not eligible for exemptions under Sections 11 and 12. The tribunal found that the objects and activities of the assessee had not changed and were charitable in nature. Therefore, the CIT(A) was correct in granting the benefits of Sections 11 and 12, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.

4. Deletion of Additions Made by the Assessing Officer:

The AO had made several additions, including a significant amount of Rs. 100,00,59,234/-, which were deleted by the CIT(A). The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the CIT(A) had followed earlier judgments and provided a detailed analysis. The tribunal found no reason to interfere with these findings and dismissed the Revenue's appeal on this ground.

5. Allowance of Depreciation on Assets:

The AO disallowed depreciation on the grounds that it would lead to double deduction. The CIT(A) allowed the depreciation, citing the judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Vishwa Jagriti Mission, which held that depreciation should be allowed even if the cost of the asset had been treated as an application of income. The tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) and noted that the Supreme Court in CIT vs. Rajasthan & Gujrati Charitable Foundation Poona had upheld this view. Thus, the tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal on this issue.

Conclusion:

The tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals for the assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08, granting the application of income for charitable purposes and the deemed application under Section 11(1) Explanation 2. The tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on eligibility for exemptions under Sections 11 and 12, deletion of additions, and allowance of depreciation on assets.

---