Tribunal rules on tax deductions for co-operative society, allowing in part and fully for different assessment years.

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for A.Y. 2008-09, upholding the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) for a co-operative society but agreeing with the CIT on treating interest income from deposits as taxable. For A.Y. 2009-10, the appeal was fully allowed, confirming the society's entitlement to the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) as it was not classified as a co-operative bank. The judgment was pronounced on October 31, 2014.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Condonation of delay in filing appeals.
2. Deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act.
3. Interest earned on deposits with other organizations and banks.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeals:
The appeals were delayed by 195 days for the assessment year (A.Y.) 2008-09 and 138 days for A.Y. 2009-10. The delay was attributed to the advice received from the auditors, initially suggesting no need to file an appeal since the CIT had remanded the issue back to the Assessing Officer (AO). Later, another firm of auditors advised filing the appeals, leading to the delay. The Tribunal accepted the explanation and condoned the delay, considering it reasonable and not willful or deliberate.

2. Deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act:
The assessee, a co-operative society, claimed deductions under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) for income derived from providing credit facilities to its members. The CIT contended that the assessee was a co-operative bank and thus ineligible for the deduction under Section 80P(4). However, the Tribunal referenced previous rulings, including the case of ACIT v. M/s. Bangalore Commercial Transport Credit Co-operative Society Ltd., which clarified that Section 80P(4) applies only to co-operative banks and not to credit co-operative societies. The Tribunal also cited the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court's decision in CIT Vs. Jafari Momin Vikas Co-op Credit Society Ltd., which supported the view that Section 80P(4) does not apply to co-operative societies. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the AO's decision to allow the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) for the assessee.

3. Interest Earned on Deposits with Other Organizations and Banks:
The CIT argued that the interest earned on deposits with Davangere Urban Co-op. Bank should be considered as income from other sources and not eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) or Section 80P(2)(a)(d). The Tribunal agreed, referencing the Supreme Court's decision in Totgars Co-operative Sales Society Ltd. v. ITO, which held that interest income from investments not immediately required for business purposes falls under "income from other sources." The Tribunal concluded that the interest earned on deposits with Davangere Urban Co-op. Bank did not have a direct nexus with the business of providing credit facilities to members and thus could not be exempt under Sections 80P(2)(a)(i) or 80P(2)(a)(d).

Separate Judgment for A.Y. 2009-10:
For A.Y. 2009-10, the only issue was the applicability of Section 80P(4). The Tribunal reiterated its previous stance that the assessee was a co-operative society and not a co-operative bank, thus entitled to the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The order of the CIT was quashed, and the appeal was allowed.

Conclusion:
- A.Y. 2008-09: The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal upholding the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) but agreeing with the CIT on the treatment of interest income from deposits.
- A.Y. 2009-10: The appeal was fully allowed, quashing the CIT's order and affirming the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).

Pronouncement: The judgment was pronounced on October 31, 2014.

---