Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal's finding that the assessee's wife was his benamidar and that the partnership income was assessable in the assessee's hands was based on any material.
Analysis: In a reference under section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the court will not reappraise the sufficiency of evidence if there is some material supporting the finding. The Tribunal relied on several circumstances, including the source of the capital, ownership of the properties said to have yielded the funds, the wife's lack of withdrawals from the firm, the assessee's enjoyment of the partnership benefits, and the surrounding conduct indicating benami ownership. Those circumstances were sufficient material for the conclusion reached by the Tribunal.
Conclusion: The finding that the wife was the benamidar of the assessee was supported by material and could not be disturbed; the partnership income was rightly assessed in the assessee's hands.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the assessee, and the inclusion of the wife's share income in the assessee's assessment was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: In a tax reference, a finding of fact is not open to interference if it is supported by some material, and the court will not examine the sufficiency of that material.