Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessments in respect of the wakf trust were justified under section 21(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, and not under section 21(4) of that Act, where the beneficiaries were known and their shares were determinate.
Analysis: The wakf deed provided that after expiry of the stated period and after meeting specified expenses, the entire remaining income was to be distributed in equal shares among five sons of the wakif. On those terms, the beneficiaries were identifiable and their shares were fixed and determinate. Where the beneficiaries of a trust are determinate and known, the proper provision is section 21(1), and assessment on the trustee has to be made in the same status as that of the beneficiaries, with as many assessments as there are beneficiaries. The facts fitted that principle and did not attract section 21(4).
Conclusion: The assessments were correctly made under section 21(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, and the Revenue's contention based on section 21(4) failed.