Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the entire sum of Rs. 1,94,299 could be treated and taxed as capital gains arising only from the sale of shares, or whether the consideration had to be apportioned between the transfer of shares and the delegation of powers connected with the managing directorship.
Analysis: The consideration under the agreement was found to be composite, covering both the shares and the transfer of managerial rights. Under Section 12B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, capital gains had to be computed with reference to the true legal character of the receipt, and the taxing authority could not ignore the transaction as structured and treat the whole amount as referable only to share sale. The agreement was not challenged, and the tribunal's approach in disregarding the legal effect of the arrangement was held to be wrong. The proper course was to apportion the total consideration between the two components and then compute the taxable capital gain after allowing permissible deductions.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the negative and in favour of the assessee. The entire sum could not be taxed as capital gains arising only from the sale of shares, and the matter required fresh computation by apportionment.