Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI • Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions • Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations • Issue-wise legal analysis • Practical arguments and supporting content • Professionally structured draft ready for further review.
ITAT Kolkata: Payment Deadline, Property Alienation Prohibition, Conditional Stay Extension The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata directed the assessee to pay Rs. 1.20 crores by a specified date and provide evidence of payment to the Registry on ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata directed the assessee to pay Rs. 1.20 crores by a specified date and provide evidence of payment to the Registry on the same day. The Tribunal prohibited the assessee from alienating immovable properties without prior consent until arrears for the assessment year 2013-14 were settled. The Tribunal decided to keep the demand in abeyance for six months or until the appeal's disposal, subject to specified conditions. Failure to make the required payment by the deadline would automatically vacate the conditional stay granted.
Issues: Stay application for demand in abeyance for assessment year 2013-14 due to transfer pricing adjustment on AMP expenses.
In this judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata, the issue revolved around a stay application where the assessee sought to keep the demand of Rs. 6,16,12,850 in abeyance for the assessment year 2013-14 due to a transfer pricing adjustment made on advertising, marketing, and promotion (AMP) expenses amounting to Rs. 15,60,70,679. The assessee argued that apart from the AMP adjustment, all other international transactions were accepted to be at Arm's length by the ld. TPO. The assessee contended that the transaction of AMP did not fall within the definition of international transaction as per Section 92B of the Act, citing the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in a specific case. The assessee expressed willingness to pay 20% of the total demand in line with a recent CBDT Circular and consented to adjustment of refunds towards tax arrears until the appeal's disposal by the Tribunal. On the other hand, the ld. DR relied on another decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, arguing that AMP expenditure is indeed an international transaction.
The Tribunal, after hearing both sides, accepted the arguments of the ld. AR that the appeal before them should be considered as the first appeal. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the assessee to pay Rs. 1.20 crores by a specified date and provide evidence of payment to the Registry on the same day. Additionally, the assessee was prohibited from alienating any immovable properties without the prior consent of the Administrative Commissioner of Income Tax to safeguard the revenue's interest until the arrears for the assessment year 2013-14 were settled. The Tribunal also noted that a similar issue was involved in the appeal for the assessment year 2012-13, scheduled for a hearing on a specific date, and ordered the case to be listed along with the 2012-13 appeal. The Tribunal decided to keep the demand in abeyance for six months or until the appeal's disposal, subject to the fulfillment of the specified conditions. However, if the assessee failed to make the required payment by the deadline, the conditional stay granted would be automatically vacated.
In conclusion, the stay application of the assessee was disposed of in accordance with the Tribunal's directions and findings.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.