Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1982 (12) TMI 7 - HC - Wealth-tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Actuarially valued gratuity provisions are deductible present liabilities in valuation of shares, net assets, and estate duty computations. An actuarially computed gratuity provision is treated as the present discounted value of an existing liability, so it is deductible and not a contingent ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Actuarially valued gratuity provisions are deductible present liabilities in valuation of shares, net assets, and estate duty computations.

                          An actuarially computed gratuity provision is treated as the present discounted value of an existing liability, so it is deductible and not a contingent liability for wealth-tax, gift-tax and estate duty valuation purposes. A provision for proposed dividends is also deductible in computing a company's net assets because it represents a current liability reflected in the balance-sheet. For valuing unquoted shares gifted between balance-sheet dates, the earlier balance-sheet is not conclusive; both surrounding balance-sheets may be considered to arrive at a realistic break-up value. The same present-liability approach applies when valuing a deceased partner's interest, requiring deduction of the gratuity provision.




                          Issues: (i) Whether a provision for gratuity based on actuarial valuation is a contingent liability or a present liability for purposes of valuation under the wealth-tax, gift-tax and estate duty laws; (ii) Whether a provision for proposed dividends is deductible in computing the net assets of a company; (iii) Whether, in valuing unquoted shares gifted between two balance-sheet dates, the earlier balance-sheet alone must be adopted.

                          Issue (i): Whether a provision for gratuity based on actuarial valuation is a contingent liability or a present liability for purposes of valuation under the wealth-tax, gift-tax and estate duty laws.

                          Analysis: Gratuity as such remains contingent until the relevant contingency occurs, but a provision for gratuity made on a scientific or actuarial basis represents the present discounted value of an existing and ascertainable liability. Such provision is a charge against profits and a current liability in the balance-sheet. It therefore does not fall within the category of contingent liabilities excluded under the wealth-tax rules. The same principle applies to valuation of unquoted shares under the gift-tax and estate duty provisions, because the real enquiry is the present value of the liability reflected in the accounts.

                          Conclusion: The provision for gratuity is deductible and is not to be treated as a contingent liability; the answer is against the Revenue.

                          Issue (ii): Whether a provision for proposed dividends is deductible in computing the net assets of a company.

                          Analysis: A provision for proposed dividend is a present liability shown in the balance-sheet and affects the ascertainment of the company's net worth. The governing principle accepted in the earlier Supreme Court ruling applies directly to this item.

                          Conclusion: The provision for proposed dividends is deductible; the answer is against the Revenue.

                          Issue (iii): Whether, in valuing unquoted shares gifted between two balance-sheet dates, the earlier balance-sheet alone must be adopted.

                          Analysis: There is no rigid rule that only the last published balance-sheet preceding the gift must be taken. The proper approach is to consider the balance-sheets immediately before and after the date of gift and arrive, as nearly as possible, at the break-up value as on the relevant date.

                          Conclusion: The earlier balance-sheet alone cannot be treated as conclusive; both balance-sheets may be taken into account, and the answer is against the assessee on the narrow contention but in substance the valuation must be made on a realistic basis.

                          Issue (iv): Whether the same principle applies to the valuation of a deceased partner's interest in a firm for estate duty purposes.

                          Analysis: A partner's interest is valued on a notional realisation of the firm's assets and liabilities. Since a gratuity provision based on actuarial valuation is a real present liability, it must be deducted while determining the net capital of the firm for valuation of the deceased partner's share.

                          Conclusion: The gratuity provision is deductible in valuing the deceased partner's interest; the answer is in favour of the accountable person.

                          Final Conclusion: The common question across the references is resolved by treating an actuarially valued gratuity provision as a real present liability, deductible in valuation exercises under the relevant fiscal statutes, and the references are answered against the Department.

                          Ratio Decidendi: A gratuity provision computed on actuarial principles as the present discounted value of the employer's liability is a current and existing liability, not a contingent liability, and must be recognised accordingly for valuation and deduction purposes unless a specific statutory provision disallows it.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found