Tribunal upholds CIT(A)'s decisions on AY 2011-12 & AY 2012-13, dismissing appeals based on accounting standards & legal precedents.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals for AY 2011-12 and AY 2012-13, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on all grounds. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) correctly applied relevant accounting standards and legal precedents in deleting the additions and adjustments made by the AO, including provisions for inventory written off, employee contributions, unrealized foreign exchange loss, and adjustments under section 115JB for computing book profit.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition for provision of inventory written off.
2. Deletion of addition for employee’s contribution to PF and ESIC paid after due date.
3. Treatment of provision for earlier termination of lease and unrealized foreign exchange loss.
4. Adjustment made under section 115JB for computing book profit.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Addition for Provision of Inventory Written Off:
The primary issue was whether the CIT(A) was justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 63,83,793 for the provision of inventory written off. The assessee had grounded aircraft operations in FY 2007-08, and some spares remained unused. The AO noted that the assessee had written off stock based on a third-party quotation and concluded that the revaluation was not justifiable without considering factors like wear and tear or obsolescence. The CIT(A) held that the assessee duly followed AS-2 on valuation inventory and valued the stores based on cost or net realizable value, whichever was lower. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s order, finding that the assessee had valued the inventory as per AS-2 and had written down the value of obsolete and non-moving spare parts.

2. Deletion of Addition for Employee’s Contribution to PF and ESIC Paid After Due Date:
The second issue was whether the CIT(A) was justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 67,97,382 for employee’s contribution to PF and ESIC paid after the due date. The AO disallowed the deduction, but the CIT(A) allowed it, noting that the payments were made before the due date of filing the return of income. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s order, referencing the decisions in CIT v. M/s Alom Extrusions Ltd. and CIT v. M/s Hindustan Organics Chemicals Ltd., which allowed such deductions if paid before the due date of filing the return.

3. Treatment of Provision for Earlier Termination of Lease and Unrealized Foreign Exchange Loss:
For the AY 2012-13, the issue involved the disallowance of unrealized foreign exchange loss of Rs. 2,61,260 and a provision for liability of Rs. 1,50,00,000 due to early termination of lease. The CIT(A) directed the AO to delete these disallowances, citing the Supreme Court decision in Woodward Governor and the ITAT Special Bench judgment in DCIT v. Bank of Bahrain and Kuwait. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s order, noting that the liability was crystallized and not contingent, referencing the assessee’s own case for AY 2010-11.

4. Adjustment Made Under Section 115JB for Computing Book Profit:
The final issue was whether the CIT(A) was justified in deleting the adjustment of Rs. 3,74,59,683 made under section 115JB for computing book profit. The AO had made adjustments including provisions for earlier termination of leases, disallowance under section 14A, provision for inventory written off, and provision for foreign exchange loss. The CIT(A) held that the AO’s adjustments were not permissible as they were ascertained liabilities and outside the scope of clause (c) of Explanation 1 of section 115JB. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s order, referencing the Supreme Court decision in Apollo Tyres Ltd., which limited the AO’s power to make adjustments in book profit.

Conclusion:
The appeals for AY 2011-12 and AY 2012-13 were dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)’s decisions on all grounds. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) correctly applied relevant accounting standards and legal precedents in deleting the additions and adjustments made by the AO.

---