TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the certificate of incorporation issued under Part VIII of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 was conclusive evidence of valid registration and barred a challenge to the legality of the company's constitution. (ii) Whether immovable properties described in the partnership documents vested in the companies without a registered conveyance and whether the properties could be treated as partnership assets by agreement. (iii) Whether the first company was invalidated because two shareholders were minors at the date of incorporation and whether the guardian's acceptance of the gift and related conditions was effective on their behalf.
Issue (i): Whether the certificate of incorporation issued under Part VIII of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 was conclusive evidence of valid registration and barred a challenge to the legality of the company's constitution.
Analysis: The certificate of incorporation was held to operate as conclusive evidence that the statutory requirements precedent and incidental to registration had been complied with. On that footing, the legality of the association and the validity of the registration could not be questioned in a suit by going behind the certificate. The reasoning treated the certificate as binding while it stood, notwithstanding objections based on the manner in which the association had been formed.
Conclusion: The challenge to the validity of the companies' incorporation failed.
Issue (ii): Whether immovable properties described in the partnership documents vested in the companies without a registered conveyance and whether the properties could be treated as partnership assets by agreement.
Analysis: The statutory scheme governing companies registered under Part VIII provided for automatic vesting of property belonging to or vested in the association on the date of registration. The Court further held that where intending associates agreed to treat property as partnership stock for the purpose of the contemplated corporate structure, no separate registered conveyance was necessary to make the statutory transfer effective. The objection based on the formal requirements applicable to sales and gifts of immovable property was therefore rejected.
Conclusion: The properties validly vested in the companies and no registered conveyance was required.
Issue (iii): Whether the first company was invalidated because two shareholders were minors at the date of incorporation and whether the guardian's acceptance of the gift and related conditions was effective on their behalf.
Analysis: The certificate of incorporation could not validate a transfer that was otherwise incapable in law, but the Court found no legal bar to a natural guardian accepting a gift on behalf of minors and carrying out a condition attached to a transaction that was beneficial to them. The minors had acquired their interests only through the gift, and the arrangement by which their interests were brought into the corporate structure was treated as advantageous rather than prejudicial. The attack on the transaction therefore could not succeed.
Conclusion: Minority did not invalidate the first company or the related transfers.
Final Conclusion: The plaintiff's challenge to the existence of the companies and to the vesting of the properties in them failed, and the suit was dismissed apart from the admitted partition relief.
Ratio Decidendi: A certificate of incorporation issued under the applicable company statute is conclusive evidence of due registration and prevents a collateral challenge to the company's constitution, while property agreed to be brought into the corporate venture vests by operation of the statute without a separate registered conveyance.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
