Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Permission Granted for Premises Leasing to Reliance Corporate IT Park Ltd. Balancing Economic Stability and Legal Process</h1> <h3>Bijay Kumar Jaiswal & Ors. Versus Shree Valley Realtors Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.</h3> The National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata granted permission for the leasing of premises to Reliance Corporate IT Park Ltd. The decision aimed to address ... Oppression and Management - HELD THAT:- The applicant has sufficiently explained its reason to let out a portion of its building for earning money. In a case of oppression and mismanagement keeping idle a building which would fetch rent would cause hardship to the business interest of the Company. The letting can be terminated by giving 6 month notice on either side. The issues that higher rent would fetch if the vacancy in the building is advertised, that the applicant had fabricated the offer letter are cannot be considered at this preliminary hearing stage. It requires larger evidence. Therefore, in the better interest of the RI company, it appears to me that permission to let out the building basement floor referred to above can be allowed subject to passing final order in the IA with a direction to the applicant to keep the rent in a separate account in the name of the company which could not be utilised for any purpose until the disposal of the CP and file periodical report in every three month in the Tribunal by giving copy to the respondent. List the IA for hearing along with the CP to 10.05.2019. Issues:- Application for vacation of order dated February 14, 2017- Stay of proceedings pending disposal of application- Ad interim order sought- Allegations of oppressive and prejudicial management- Request for modification of injunction order- Proposal for leasing premises to Reliance Corporate IT Park Ltd.- Objections raised against leasing proposal- Argument regarding current utilization of premises as a banquet hall- Consideration of reasonable rent offered for leasing- Decision on granting permission to let out premisesAnalysis:The judgment by the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata involved the consideration of an application seeking various reliefs, including the vacation of an order dated February 14, 2017, and a stay on further proceedings pending the disposal of the application. The applicant contended that due to the interim order preventing dealing with immovable property without consent, the company was facing economic loss and prejudice. The respondent alleged oppressive and prejudicial management by the applicant, leading to the issuance of the interim order maintaining status quo on shareholding and property disposal.The main issue revolved around the request for modification of the injunction order to allow leasing of vacant premises to Reliance Corporate IT Park Ltd. The applicant argued that the premises were being kept idle due to the injunction, causing financial hardship. The proposed lease agreement detailed the area and rental terms, emphasizing the need to generate regular income for the company. The respondent objected to the leasing proposal, claiming the offer letter was fabricated and that the petitioner's consent was not obtained in writing.During the hearing, both parties presented their arguments regarding the utilization of the premises, with the respondent highlighting the current rental income from banquet hall usage. However, the applicant justified the need to lease the premises for consistent revenue generation. The tribunal acknowledged the applicant's reasoning and granted permission to let out the building basement floor, subject to certain conditions like keeping the rent in a separate account and providing periodic reports to the tribunal.In conclusion, the tribunal allowed the leasing of the premises to Reliance Corporate IT Park Ltd., emphasizing the importance of generating income for the company's business interests. The decision balanced the need for financial stability with the ongoing legal proceedings, ensuring proper monitoring of the rental income until the final resolution of the case.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found