TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal modifies tax additions, upholds PF disallowance. Section 14A and employee contributions analyzed.</h1> <h3>Sagar Yeswantrai Mehta Versus The ACIT, Circle-2 (1) (2), Ahmedabad</h3> Sagar Yeswantrai Mehta Versus The ACIT, Circle-2 (1) (2), Ahmedabad - TMI Issues:1. Proper opportunity of hearing not given by CIT(A)2. Addition under Section 14A r. w. r. 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 19623. Disallowance of employees' contribution to PF account under section 36(1)(va) r. w. s. 2(24)(x) of the ActAnalysis:1. The first issue raised by the assessee was regarding the lack of proper opportunity of hearing provided by the CIT(A). The appellant contended that the appeal was decided ex-parte without a fair chance to present arguments. However, during the hearing, the appellant's counsel did not advance any argument on this issue, leading to its rejection by the tribunal.2. The second issue pertained to the addition of Rs. 8,05,856 under Section 14A r. w. r. 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. The Assessing Officer had disallowed this amount as per Rule 8D, based on the analysis of the expenditure required to earn tax-free dividend income declared by the assessee. The tribunal, after considering relevant case laws, observed that the disallowance should not exceed the amount of exempt income. Therefore, the tribunal partially allowed this ground, restricting the disallowance to the tax-free income of Rs. 22,697 declared by the assessee.3. The final issue revolved around the disallowance of Rs. 10,80,088 related to employees' contribution to the PF account under section 36(1)(va) r. w. s. 2(24)(x) of the Act. The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim as the assessee failed to make the payment within the due date specified under the PF Act. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance citing a judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat, which stated that non-payment of employees' contribution within the stipulated time would render the assessee ineligible for deduction. The tribunal, finding no reason to interfere with this decision, rejected the appeal on this ground.In conclusion, the tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, modifying the additions made by the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) based on the issues raised and the legal interpretations provided during the proceedings.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
