TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Tribunal directs reassessment under Income-tax Act, 1961</h1> <h3>M/s Kanhaiyalal & Sons (HUF), Smt. Kiran Devi Jain Versus The Income Tax Officer, Non Corporate Ward - 5 (1), Chennai</h3> M/s Kanhaiyalal & Sons (HUF), Smt. Kiran Devi Jain Versus The Income Tax Officer, Non Corporate Ward - 5 (1), Chennai - TMI Issues:Rejection of claim under Section 10(38) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Analysis:The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai involved appeals by independent assessees against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Chennai, for the assessment year 2014-15. The key issue in consideration was the rejection of the assessees' claim under Section 10(38) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessees' counsel argued that the Assessing Officer disallowed the claim based on information from the Investigation Wing at Kolkata, without providing the assessees with copies of the investigation report or details of the enquiries conducted. The counsel requested a remittance back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision after providing the necessary materials. Reference was made to a previous Tribunal order for support.The Tribunal, after hearing from the Departmental Representative, acknowledged that the Assessing Officer had disallowed the claim without furnishing the necessary investigation report or enquiry details to the assessees. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the orders of the lower authorities and remitted the issue back to the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer was directed to reconsider the matter after providing the assessees with the material relied upon, including the role of the assessees in promoting the company, any relationships with promoters, involvement in share price inflation, and other relevant details. The Assessing Officer was instructed to furnish the investigation report from the Kolkata Department and any other relevant materials before deciding the issue afresh in compliance with the law and providing a reasonable opportunity to the assessees.As a result, both appeals by the assessees were allowed for statistical purposes, and the order was pronounced in court on 6th February 2019 in Chennai.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
