Appellant's Counsel Fined for Deficit Court Fee: Statement of Case Not Mandatory The Supreme Court held that the appellant's counsel had filed a deficit court fee, noting that a statement of the case was not mandatory as per the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellant's Counsel Fined for Deficit Court Fee: Statement of Case Not Mandatory
The Supreme Court held that the appellant's counsel had filed a deficit court fee, noting that a statement of the case was not mandatory as per the amended Supreme Court Rules of 2013. The case was directed to be listed before the Hon'ble Court in accordance with the rules.
Summary: The appellant's counsel filed deficit court fee. Statement of case not mandatory as per amended Supreme Court Rules, 2013. Case to be listed before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.