TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellant's Counsel Fined for Deficit Court Fee: Statement of Case Not Mandatory</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, NEW DELHI Versus M/s. PETRONET LNG LTD.</h3> The Supreme Court held that the appellant's counsel had filed a deficit court fee, noting that a statement of the case was not mandatory as per the ... Supply of tangible goods - transfer of possession and effective control of the tankers - import of services - Levy of service tax on reverse charge basis - Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994 - extended period of limitation - HELD THAT:- The matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. Title: Supreme Court Citation: 2016 (9) TMI 1513 - SC OrderSummary: The appellant's counsel filed deficit court fee. Statement of case not mandatory as per amended Supreme Court Rules, 2013. Case to be listed before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
