Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the share income arising to the assessee's minor children from a partnership firm in which the assessee was a partner only as karta of a Hindu undivided family could be clubbed with the assessee's individual income under section 64(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The statutory scheme of section 64(1)(ii) contemplates inclusion in the computation of the income of an individual of income arising to a minor child from admission to the benefits of partnership in a firm. The provision operates on the income of an individual as distinct from the income of a Hindu undivided family or other juristic units. On the facts found, the assessee was not a partner in his personal capacity but represented the joint family, and the minor children's income could not be brought within the clubbing provision on that basis. The contrary view of another High Court was not followed in light of the binding decision of this Court in an earlier case.
Conclusion: The question was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee; the minor children's share income was not liable to be clubbed with the assessee's individual income under section 64(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.