We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Delays in Appellate Tribunal Setup Criticized by High Court The High Court criticized the delay in setting up an appellate Tribunal as per a Supreme Court order, noting the lack of concrete proposals from the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Delays in Appellate Tribunal Setup Criticized by High Court
The High Court criticized the delay in setting up an appellate Tribunal as per a Supreme Court order, noting the lack of concrete proposals from the G.S.T. Council and State. It expressed concern over the denial of the petitioner's right to appeal and the Government's quick actions in recoveries without providing appeal forums. The Court demanded improved affidavits with a cut-off date for Tribunal establishment. The governments were directed to submit revised proposals within two weeks, with a follow-up scheduled for March 15, 2019, and ordered communication of the directive to relevant counsels for prompt compliance.
Issues: 1. Failure to set up an appellate Tribunal in accordance with the Supreme Court order. 2. Denial of the right of appeal to the petitioner. 3. Lack of concrete proposal for setting up the Tribunal. 4. Government's delay in providing forums for appeals. 5. Need for a cut-off date for setting up the Tribunal.
Analysis: The High Court noted that despite the order passed, two affidavits were filed by the G.S.T. Council and the State. The Court observed that the promises made were merely verbal, with no concrete proposal for establishing the appellate Tribunal. The affidavit by the State indicated a recommendation to set up a Bench in Lucknow, contrary to the Supreme Court's directive that the Tribunal should be located where the Principal Bench of the High Court is situated, which in this case is Allahabad. This delay was deemed as dilatory tactics.
The Court expressed concern over the denial of the petitioner's right to appeal and criticized the State and Centre for being quick in making recoveries from individuals with orders against them while failing to provide a forum for appeals. The Court emphasized that a litigant should not be left without a remedy due to the Government's inability to establish necessary forums. There was no assurance of a timeline for setting up the Tribunal, prompting the Court to demand better affidavits from both the Centre and State Governments.
In response to the situation, the High Court directed the governments to submit improved affidavits specifying a cut-off date for establishing the Tribunal. The learned Standing Counsel indicated the likelihood of presenting a revised proposal within two weeks. The matter was scheduled for a follow-up on 15th March 2019, with the exemption of personal appearances unless specifically directed by the Court. The Court also instructed the communication of the order to relevant counsels for compliance within 24 hours.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.