Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether multiple FIRs arising out of the consortium banking transaction could be quashed or clubbed and treated as a single FIR on the ground that they related to the same conspiracy and same transaction.
Analysis: The application was founded on the principle that there can be only one FIR for the same cognizable occurrence, but the Court held that the applicability of that rule depended on whether the later complaints were truly in respect of the same incident or disclosed distinct offences. On the material before it, the Court found that the representations were routed through the core committee acting for the member banks, that the individual banks had sanctioned separate credit facilities against separate work contracts, and that even on the assumption of one larger conspiracy the alleged cheating of each bank constituted a separate offence. The Court further held that, since investigation was incomplete and charge-sheets had not been filed, it was inappropriate to record findings on the merits of the alleged conspiracy at that stage.
Conclusion: The request to quash, club, or treat the FIRs as one was rejected, and the separate FIRs lodged by the respondent banks were held to be maintainable.