Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the interpretation of the proviso to Section 34(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in relation to commercial transactions and the contractual rate of interest required consideration by a larger Bench.
Analysis: The question arose because the award of interest under the recovery legislation and the applicability of Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, including its proviso for commercial transactions, needed to be reconciled with the earlier Constitution Bench view on pendente lite and post-decree interest. The matter was considered appropriate for examination by a larger Bench so that the proviso to Section 34(1) could be interpreted without creating any conflict with the earlier decision.
Conclusion: The issue was referred to a larger Bench for consideration.