Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an unregistered patta purporting to transfer the right to collect market dues from land used for a weekly fair was a transfer of immovable property and, if so, whether it was inadmissible in evidence for want of registration.
Analysis: The right claimed was not merely a personal permission, but a right to enter upon land temporarily and to receive dues arising from that land. Such a right fell within the statutory expression "any other benefit to arise out of land" in the definition of immovable property. As the transaction was a lease for a term exceeding one year reserving yearly rent, it required registration under the relevant provisions of the Transfer of Property Act and the Registration Act. The unregistered patta therefore could not operate to transfer the interest or be received in evidence.
Conclusion: The unregistered instrument was ineffective to convey the right claimed and was inadmissible in evidence. The order of remand was set aside and the decree dismissing the suit was restored.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded, and the trial court's dismissal of the suit was reinstated on the ground that the claimed market-dues right was an immovable-property interest requiring registration.
Ratio Decidendi: A right to collect dues from land, where it is annexed to temporary enjoyment of the land, is a "benefit to arise out of land" and therefore immovable property requiring registration when transferred by lease.