Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2014 (5) TMI 1189 - HC - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court approves Cadbury India's share capital reduction at Rs. 2,014.50 per share, dismissing minority objections on valuation. The Court approved Cadbury India Limited's special resolution for the reduction of share capital, despite objections from minority shareholders regarding ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Court approves Cadbury India's share capital reduction at Rs. 2,014.50 per share, dismissing minority objections on valuation.

                          The Court approved Cadbury India Limited's special resolution for the reduction of share capital, despite objections from minority shareholders regarding the valuation of shares. The Court accepted the valuation of Rs. 2,014.50 per share determined by Ernst & Young and dismissed the objections raised by the objecting shareholders. The Court emphasized the importance of fairness and reasonableness in such matters and made the petition absolute based on the approved valuation. No costs were awarded, and related applications were dismissed.




                          Issues Involved:

                          1. Approval of a special resolution for reduction of Cadbury India's share capital.
                          2. Objections raised by shareholders against the valuation of shares.
                          3. Conduct and submissions of the objectors.
                          4. Legal principles governing the reduction of share capital.
                          5. Analysis of the valuation methods used by Ernst & Young (E & Y).
                          6. Final conclusions and orders.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Approval of Special Resolution:
                          Cadbury India Limited sought the Court's sanction for a special resolution passed by a majority of its shareholders at an extraordinary general meeting to reduce its share capital. The reason for this reduction was the policy of Cadbury India's parent companies to operate only through branches or wholly-owned subsidiaries. The resolution was approved by an overwhelming majority, including a significant portion of the non-promoter minority. However, some minority shareholders who voted against the resolution filed opposition affidavits.

                          2. Objections Raised by Shareholders:
                          The objections were primarily from the Samant and Churiwala Groups, who argued that the valuations were unfair and unreasonable. They demanded a higher valuation for their shares, pointing out several alleged deficiencies and errors in the valuations provided by E & Y. They accused Cadbury India and the valuers of bias and unfair treatment of minority shareholders.

                          3. Conduct and Submissions of the Objectors:
                          The Samant Group's conduct was criticized for being inflammatory, accusatory, and uncivil. They submitted lengthy written arguments containing new material not previously argued in court, which put the Court at a disadvantage. The Court noted that the Samant Group had persistently objected to every proposal and valuation, and their submissions were often unsupported by substantial evidence.

                          4. Legal Principles Governing Reduction of Share Capital:
                          The Court emphasized that for a scheme to be sanctioned, it must be fair, just, and reasonable, and not against public interest. The valuation must be fair, and the majority of non-promoter shareholders must vote in favor of the resolution. The Court's jurisdiction is supervisory, not appellate, and it must not substitute its own view for that of the valuer unless the valuation is shown to be egregiously wrong.

                          5. Analysis of the Valuation Methods Used by E & Y:
                          The Court considered two valuation reports by E & Y, which used the Comparable Companies Multiples (CCM) method and the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method. The second E & Y report, which included both methods, returned a higher valuation of Rs. 2,014.50 per share. The Samant Group's objections to the methods and weightages used were found to be without substance. The Court noted that valuations are inexact and based on assumptions, and it is not the Court's role to conduct a microscopic examination of the valuation exercise.

                          6. Final Conclusions and Orders:
                          The Court concluded that there was no valid objection to the scheme and accepted the valuation of Rs. 2,014.50 per share as determined by E & Y. The petition was made absolute on this basis. The Court dismissed the objections and applications filed by other parties, noting that the conduct of the Samant Group did not warrant any further consideration. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to the principles of fairness and reasonableness in such matters.

                          Final Orders:
                          - The petition was made absolute based on the valuation of Rs. 2,014.50 per share.
                          - No order as to costs.
                          - Company Application No. 71 of 2010 and Company Application No. 120 of 2010 were dismissed.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found