Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of limitation under Section 153 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the relevant date is the date on which the Income-tax Officer received the directions of the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner under Section 144B or the date on which the directions were issued.
Analysis: The assessment year was governed by the limitation scheme in Section 153(1)(a)(iii) read with Explanation 1(iv) to Section 153 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On the admitted facts, the Income-tax Officer received the directions on 5 September 1979 and passed the assessment order on 21 September 1979. The wording of Explanation 1(iv) made the receipt of directions by the Income-tax Officer the relevant date for exclusion in computing limitation, not the date of issuance of the directions by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner.
Conclusion: The assessment order was within limitation, and the question was answered in the affirmative against the assessee.