1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court orders revival of housing loan & flat allotment cancellation withdrawal. Petitioner to submit representation to respondent for compliance.</h1> The Court granted the petitioner's request for a mandamus directing respondents to revive the financial facility for a housing loan and withdraw the ... - Issues involved: Mandamus for revival of financial facility for housing loan and withdrawal of cancellation of flat allotment.The petitioner sought a mandamus directing respondents no. 3 and 4 to revive the financial facility provided for a housing loan to purchase a flat and to withdraw the letter of cancellation of the flat allotment. The petitioner's grievance was based on the Housing Development Corporation's instruction to cancel the flat allotment after receiving a letter from the Tax Recovery Officer. The Court had previously quashed the notice issued by the Tax Recovery Officer in a related case. The Court directed the petitioner to submit a detailed representation to respondent no. 4 for appropriate action in accordance with the law. The writ petition was disposed of finally.The petitioner's main contention was the cancellation of the flat allotment due to a letter from the Tax Recovery Officer, prompting the petitioner to seek a mandamus for revival of the financial facility and withdrawal of the cancellation. The Court intervened based on a previous case where the notice by the Tax Recovery Officer was quashed. The petitioner was directed to submit a detailed representation to respondent no. 4 for further action in line with the law. The writ petition was ultimately disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
