2015 (6) TMI 1184 - AT - Income Tax

ITAT Mumbai rules for assessee in protective basis addition case, emphasizing lack of unexplained cash credits

Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-43, Mumbai Versus Ravish P Zaidi

Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-43, Mumbai Versus Ravish P Zaidi - TMI Issues:1. Addition made on protective basis in the hands of the assessee regarding amount deposited in joint bank account.2. Interpretation of remand report of the Assessing Officer.Analysis:1. The case involved an appeal by the Revenue against the order of the ld. First Appellate Authority regarding the deletion of an addition made on a protective basis in the hands of the assessee. The dispute arose from deposits in a joint bank account with Ms. Chandbibi Zaidi. The Revenue contended that the deletion was erroneous as the assessee, a student studying abroad, had no independent income source. The Assessing Officer had added the amount as unexplained investment under section 69B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleted the addition based on the assessee's submissions and the remand report by the Assessing Officer, which found no unexplained cash credits in the bank accounts. The Tribunal upheld the deletion, noting the absence of contrary evidence from the Revenue.2. The key issue regarding the interpretation of the remand report of the Assessing Officer was crucial in this case. The remand report, submitted through Additional CIT Central Range 6, Mumbai, verified the credits in the bank accounts and confirmed the absence of unexplained credits. This report played a significant role in the decision to delete the addition made by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal considered the contents of the remand report, along with the submissions of the assessee, in upholding the deletion of the addition. The lack of contradictory evidence from the Revenue further supported the reliance on the remand report's findings. Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal based on the conclusions drawn from the remand report and the assessee's submissions.In conclusion, the judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai addressed the issues of addition made on a protective basis in the assessee's hands and the interpretation of the remand report of the Assessing Officer. The decision favored the assessee based on the lack of unexplained cash credits found in the bank accounts, as confirmed by the remand report. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition, emphasizing the absence of contradictory evidence from the Revenue.