Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the first proviso to Section 12A(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, inserted by the Finance Act, 2014, applies retrospectively so as to extend the benefit of Sections 11 and 12 to earlier assessment years whose proceedings were pending when registration was granted under Section 12AA.
Analysis: The proviso was introduced to remove the hardship caused to genuine charitable trusts that were otherwise eligible for exemption but had not yet secured registration. The provision was held to be procedural and curative in nature, intended to remedy an unintended omission and to make the exemption scheme workable. The pending appellate proceedings were treated as assessment proceedings pending before the Assessing Officer for the purpose of the proviso. The Court also relied on the CBDT explanatory circular and the principle that beneficial and remedial amendments may operate retrospectively where the legislative intent is to confer relief without imposing a new burden.
Conclusion: The first proviso to Section 12A(2) was held to operate retrospectively, and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of Sections 11 and 12 for the relevant earlier years.