Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Assessing Officer's Time-Barred Order Upheld by ITAT</h1> <h3>Income Tax Officer (TDS) -II, Kanpur Versus M/s Uttar Pradesh Financial Corpn.</h3> Income Tax Officer (TDS) -II, Kanpur Versus M/s Uttar Pradesh Financial Corpn. - [2016] 160 ITD 284 Issues Involved:1. Whether the order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 201 of the Income Tax Act is barred by limitation.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Whether the order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 201 of the Income Tax Act is barred by limitation.Background and Facts:The case involves a State Government corporation engaged in providing finance for trade and industry. A survey by the Income Tax Department on 16/10/2005 revealed that the assessee had not deducted tax at source under section 193. The Assessing Officer (AO) issued a show-cause notice under section 201(1)/201(1A) on 09/02/2007. Despite the assessee's detailed submissions on 20/03/2007, the AO passed an order on 10/03/2011, creating a demand of Rs. 12,63,98,214/- for non-deduction/short deduction of tax and interest thereon. The CIT(A) quashed the AO's order as time-barred.CIT(A) Decision:The CIT(A) held that the order dated 10/03/2011 was barred by limitation, as it was passed after a lapse of over 3 years and 11 months from the end of the financial year in which proceedings were initiated and over 5 years and 11 months from the close of the relevant financial year. The CIT(A) relied on various judicial precedents, including Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. v. DCIT and CIT v. Hutchison Essar Telecom Ltd., which established that statutory powers must be exercised within a reasonable time.ITAT Analysis:The ITAT examined whether the AO's order dated 10/03/2011 was barred by limitation. The ITAT noted that the proceedings were initiated within the permissible time frame as per the prevailing law before the insertion of section 201(3) by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2009, effective from 01/04/2010. The ITAT emphasized that the proviso to section 201(3) allowed pending proceedings to be completed by 31/03/2011.Key Judicial Precedents Considered:1. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. v. DCIT: Upheld by the Bombay High Court, establishing that the maximum time limit for passing the order under sections 201(1) or 201(1A) is one year from the end of the financial year in which proceedings were initiated.2. CIT v. Hutchison Essar Telecom Ltd.: Delhi High Court held that proceedings under sections 201(1)/201(1A) must be initiated within three years from the end of the assessment year or within four years from the end of the relevant financial year.3. Vodafone Essar Mobile Services Ltd.: Delhi High Court clarified that the proviso to section 201(3) was meant to expand the time limit for completing pending cases, not to initiate new proceedings for periods earlier than four years prior to 31/03/2011.ITAT Conclusion:The ITAT concluded that the AO's order dated 10/03/2011 was not barred by limitation as it was passed within the permissible time frame stipulated by the proviso to section 201(3). The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the AO's order, allowing the Revenue's appeal.Final Judgment:The appeal of the Revenue was allowed, and the order of the CIT(A) was set aside, restoring the AO's order.Order Pronounced:The order was pronounced in the open court on 27/07/2016.This comprehensive analysis preserves the legal terminology and significant phrases from the original text, ensuring a thorough understanding of the judgment and the issues involved.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found