Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee was liable under section 23A(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, for the assessment year 1958-59.
Analysis: The commercial or accounting profits are to be computed on commercial principles, and the question whether a dividend should reasonably have been declared depends on the smallness of such profits and the surrounding business circumstances. The company had substantial brought-forward losses, had replaced five buses at considerable cost to maintain its transport business, and the replacement was found necessary to avoid adverse effects on its permits and continuity of operations. In these circumstances, the profits of the year could not reasonably be regarded as available for dividend distribution, and the order treating the assessee as liable under section 23A(1) could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The liability under section 23A(1) was not attracted and the answer was in the negative, against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: In determining liability under section 23A(1), the relevant test is whether, on commercial principles, it would be unreasonable to expect dividend distribution having regard to the company's commercial profits, accumulated losses, and the necessity of preserving the profit-making apparatus of the business.