Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Manufacturer wins Central Excise Duty case on discounts passed to customers, Commissioner's disallowance overturned.</h1> <h3>M/s National Plywood Industries Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata-VII.</h3> The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of Plywood and Block Boards, in a Central Excise Duty case. The discounts claimed were ... Valuation - allowability of trade discounts - HELD THAT:- The  Hon’ble Supreme Court in M/S. PUROLATOR INDIA LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI – III [2015 (8) TMI 1014 - SUPREME COURT] has held that cash and volume discounts stipulated in agreement between assessee and buyers known at or prior to clearance of the goods is to be deducted from sale price in order to arrive at value of excisable goods and that there is no change in the legal position after amendment of Sec.4 of C.Ex Act - the appellant has rightly availed abatement of the discounts involved and the Commissioner has erred in disallowing the same - the demand of duty and interest confirmed and penalties imposed upon the appellant are unsustainable.  Whether the discounts were known to the Department as well as to the buyers before removal of finished goods? - HELD THAT:- It is recorded by the Commissioner himself in the order that the discount and the nature of discounts had been duly disclosed by the appellant to all concerned including the department and the price declarations containing the respective percentage of such discounts, have also been duly filed.  It is also seen that abatements have been claimed by the appellant in respect of each of the discounts - issue decided in favor of appellant. Whether such discounts were actually passed on to customers/buyers - HELD THAT:- From the said invoices/bills we also find that the appellant during the relevant period, had claimed discounts of exactly the quantities thereof passed on to the customers. The finding in the impugned order that the appellant had claimed abatement of ₹ 4,04,77,213.47 which had  not been passed on the customer is therefore unsustainable. Time Limitation - HELD THAT:- Since we have decided the appeal is favor of the appellant on merit, we have not gone into the aspect of limitation.  Appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. Issues:1. Whether the discounts were known to the Department and buyers before removal of finished goods.2. Whether the discounts were actually passed on to customers.3. Whether part of the duty demand is barred by limitation.Issue 1: Disclosure of DiscountsThe appellant, a manufacturer of Plywood and Block Boards, claimed various discounts in determining the assessable value for Central Excise Duty. The appellant provided price declarations and details of discounts to the Central Excise authority. The Commissioner acknowledged that discounts were disclosed to all concerned, including the department. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant on this issue.Issue 2: Passing on DiscountsThe demand for duty was based on invoices/bills submitted by the appellant from their Banganagar branch office. The Tribunal noted that the invoices clearly indicated goods from the Banganagar Unit and that discounts claimed were passed on to customers. Citing legal precedents, including decisions by the Supreme Court and Tribunal, the Tribunal held that the appellant rightfully availed discounts, and the Commissioner erred in disallowing them. Consequently, the duty demand, interest, and penalties imposed were deemed unsustainable.Issue 3: LimitationAs the appeal was decided in favor of the appellant on merit, the Tribunal did not delve into the aspect of limitation. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.This judgment highlights the appellant's entitlement to discounts, the necessity of passing on discounts to customers, and the legal precedents supporting the appellant's position. The Tribunal's detailed analysis and reliance on established legal principles underscore the importance of proper disclosure and passing on of discounts in Central Excise matters.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found