Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether transportation charges shown as depot charges or handling charges were includible in the assessable value of excisable goods cleared to depots.
Analysis: The dispute turned on valuation under the substituted Section 4 with effect from 01.07.2000 and the concept of transaction value. The clearance from the factory gate was reflected in the excise records, and the assessee had sold the goods from depots at the prevailing depot price. On the facts, the Tribunal found that the demand proceeded on an incorrect application of the valuation rules where factory gate price was available. It held that excise is a levy on manufacture and that transportation or freight related charges are not to be added to assessable value merely because they were described differently in invoices.
Conclusion: The transportation charges were not includible in the assessable value, and the demand based on their inclusion was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded in resisting the excise demand, and the Revenue appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where factory gate price is available and the goods are assessed on the basis of transaction value under Section 4, transportation or freight related charges are not includible in the assessable value merely because of the manner in which they are described in the invoices.