Supreme Court dismisses petition seeking ban on cow slaughter, emphasizing legislative authority.

The Supreme Court of India dismissed a petition seeking a ban on the slaughter of cows, buffaloes, horses, and chameleons, emphasizing that such decisions fall under legislative purview and cannot be imposed by the judiciary. The Court reiterated that Parliament has the authority to enact laws, and the judiciary cannot compel the legislature to pass specific legislation. Therefore, the Court concluded that it could not grant the requested relief through the writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution.

---

---

Issues involved: Petition under Article 32 seeking ban on slaughter of cows, buffaloes, horses, and chameleons.

The petition sought a writ of mandamus u/s Article 32 to direct a total ban on slaughter of cows, buffaloes, horses, and chameleons, citing religious sentiments and constitutional commitments. The Court noted that such a ban falls under the purview of legislative decision-making and cannot be imposed by the judiciary. Reference was made to previous judgments emphasizing that Parliament holds the sovereign power to enact laws, and courts cannot compel the legislature to pass specific legislation. The Court concluded that it cannot provide the requested relief through the writ petition, leading to its dismissal.

In this judgment, the Supreme Court of India addressed a petition seeking a ban on the slaughter of certain animals based on religious beliefs and constitutional considerations. The Court clarified that decisions regarding such bans are within the legislative domain and cannot be mandated by the judiciary. Emphasizing the principle that Parliament holds the authority to enact laws, the Court highlighted that it cannot direct the legislature to pass specific legislation. As a result, the petition was dismissed as the Court found itself unable to grant the requested relief through the writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution.

---