Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to carry forward and set off unabsorbed depreciation for assessment year 1997-98 against the income of assessment year 2005-06 under section 32(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the challenge to reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 survived for adjudication.
Analysis: The second question raised by the Revenue was stated to be squarely covered by the decision of the Court in General Motors India Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. In view of that binding precedent, the controversy regarding reopening did not require separate adjudication and was treated as academic.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to the benefit claimed under section 32(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the reopening issue was not adjudicated as it had become academic.