TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the seized vehicle was liable to be released on superdari and whether the confiscation provisions of the Delhi Excise Act barred such release.
Analysis: The vehicle was found to have been seized by the police and not confiscated. On that basis, the confiscation provision under Section 58 of the Delhi Excise Act was held inapplicable to the vehicle. The Court further noted that the governing procedure for release of the vehicle was to be found in Chapter VI of the Delhi Excise Act and Section 451 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Since the vehicle was no longer required by the police, there was no impediment to its interim release to the registered owner on superdari.
Conclusion: The vehicle was directed to be released to the registered owner on superdari.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
