Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Section 125 of the Companies Act, 1956 rendered unenforceable, against the official liquidator, a mortgage decree for sale obtained before the winding-up order on the basis of an unregistered mortgage by deposit of title deeds.
Analysis: Section 125 operates against a charge created by the company which is required to be registered, failing which the charge is void as against the liquidator and creditors. A decree obtained on a mortgage is not itself a charge created by the company, but a separate adjudication creating enforceable rights under the decree. The fact that the mortgagor's right of redemption may continue under the decree or under the law does not convert the decree into the mortgage or into a charge created by the company. The decree in question had been passed before the winding-up petition and was not shown to be collusive or unconscionable. Section 529 also did not assist the applicants on the facts.
Conclusion: Section 125 did not prevent execution of the pre-winding-up mortgage decree, and the decree was not void as against the official liquidator.
Final Conclusion: An unregistered mortgage may be void as a charge against the liquidator, but a prior decree for sale enforcing that mortgage remains enforceable and cannot be treated as void merely because winding up subsequently intervened.
Ratio Decidendi: A decree enforcing a mortgage or charge, if validly passed before winding up, is distinct from the underlying charge and is not hit by the registration-invalidity rule applicable to charges created by the company.