TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Houseboat owners providing lodging services not deemed tour operators under Finance Act. Department's appeal rejected.</h1> <h3>C.C.E., CUS. & S.T., COCHIN Versus KERALA BACKWATERS PRIVATE LIMITED</h3> C.C.E., CUS. & S.T., COCHIN Versus KERALA BACKWATERS PRIVATE LIMITED - 2019 (22) G. S. T. L. 93 (Tri. - Bang.) Issues:Department appealing against Order-in-Appeal, classification of respondents as tour operators, interpretation of 'Tour Operator' under Section 65(113) of Finance Act, 1994.Analysis:The case involved appeals by the Department against Order-in-Appeal Nos. 116 to 124/2008-S.T., dated 30-6-2008. The respondents, house boat owners registered under the Kerala Tax on Luxuries Act, 1976, provided boarding and lodging services to tourists. The Department considered them as tour operators, demanding Service Tax. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) ruled in favor of the respondents, stating they were not tour operators. The Department then filed appeals against this decision.Upon hearing all parties and examining the record, the Tribunal considered the definition of 'Tour Operator' under Section 65(113) of the Finance Act, 1994. The definition includes persons engaged in planning, organizing, or arranging tours, which may involve accommodation and other services. In this case, the respondents provided accommodation to tourists on direct booking or through tour operators, without offering transportation services or holding necessary permits. Their activities were limited to the boat itself, similar to a hotel on water. The Tribunal concluded that the respondents, as 'House Boat Owners,' did not meet the criteria to be classified as tour operators under the law.Based on the above analysis, the Tribunal found no grounds to overturn the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision, which was upheld along with the reasons provided. Consequently, the Department's appeals were rejected. The order was pronounced and dictated in open court on 8-2-2018.
TaxTMI 