TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Delhi High Court PE & Profit Attribution Case: Key Legal Questions Identified, Notice of Appeal Issued</h1> <h3>Ge Engine Services Distribution LLC Versus Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation)</h3> Ge Engine Services Distribution LLC Versus Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation) - TMI Issues:1. Existence of a fixed place Permanent Establishment (PE) in India2. Existence of a separately independent agent PE in India3. Justifiability of attributing profits to marketing activities and the alleged PE in IndiaAnalysis:The High Court of Delhi addressed multiple issues in this judgment. The first issue pertained to whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) erred in determining the existence of a fixed place Permanent Establishment (PE) of the assessee in India. The second issue raised was whether the ITAT incorrectly concluded that the assessee/appellant's separately independent agent PE was situated in India. Lastly, the court examined whether the ITAT's decision to attribute 35% of the profits to marketing activities and subsequently assigning 75% of this 35% to the alleged PE of the Appellant in India was justified based on the facts, circumstances, and applicable law.The court admitted the case and identified the key questions of law to be addressed. These questions encompassed the core issues of PE existence, attribution of profits, and the correctness of the ITAT's findings. The court directed the issuance of a notice of appeal to the respondent-Revenue, represented by Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. The case was scheduled for a final hearing on 11th April 2018, with a requirement for both parties to submit a concise synopsis not exceeding seven pages each. The synopsis was expected to outline relevant arguments supported by references to the record and precedent relied upon.In conclusion, the judgment highlighted the critical aspects of PE determination, profit attribution, and the legal reasoning behind the ITAT's decisions. The court's detailed analysis and procedural directions underscored the significance of the issues at hand and the need for a thorough examination of the relevant facts and legal principles.
TaxTMI 