Tribunal rejects excessive AMP expenses, remits set-off issue for fresh review, partially grants appeal

The Tribunal deleted the addition of &8377; 23,83,92,783 for AMP expenses, citing unsustainable application of the bright line test for ALP adjustments. The issue of set off for brought forward business losses amounting to &8377; 26,25,85,933 was remitted for fresh adjudication due to previous additions in assessment years. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing cooperation with the Assessing Officer for expedited proceedings and dismissing the stay application as infructuous.

---

---

Issues:
1. Addition of &8377; 23,83,92,783 for arm's length price adjustment for advertising promotion and marketing (AMP) expenses.
2. Denial of set off for brought forward business losses.

Analysis:

*Issue 1: Addition of &8377; 23,83,92,783 for AMP Expenses*
The appeal challenges the addition of &8377; 23,83,92,783 made by the Assessing Officer for arm's length price adjustment for AMP expenses. The Transfer Pricing Officer initially recommended an adjustment of &8377; 51,06,32,341, but this was later deleted by the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer then made a protective addition based on the Bright Line Test to safeguard revenue interests pending a Supreme Court decision. However, the Tribunal found no merit in this protective basis adjustment. It emphasized that the application of the bright line test for ALP adjustments in AMP expenses is unsustainable as per binding judicial precedents. The Tribunal held that the addition must be deleted as the concept of protective addition does not apply in this case.

*Issue 2: Denial of Set Off for Brought Forward Business Losses*
The second grievance relates to the denial of set off for brought forward business losses amounting to &8377; 26,25,85,933. The Assessing Officer denied the set off due to previous additions made in preceding assessment years. The Tribunal, after hearing both parties, concluded that the matter needs fresh adjudication by the Assessing Officer considering the outcome of appellate proceedings in previous years. The Tribunal directed the assessee to cooperate with the Assessing Officer for expeditious disposal of the remanded proceedings. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication.

In conclusion, the Tribunal deleted the addition of &8377; 23,83,92,783 for AMP expenses and remitted the issue of set off for brought forward business losses for fresh adjudication. The appeal was partly allowed, and the stay application was dismissed as infructuous.

---