Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to Cenvat credit on service tax paid on construction services used for setting up a new manufacturing plant before 1-4-2011, and whether the amendment to the definition of input service with effect from 1-4-2011 operated retrospectively.
Analysis: The relevant period was prior to 1-4-2011, when the definition of input service expressly included services used for setting up of factory. The later amendment deleting those words was held to have no retrospective application. As the services were used for setting up a new plant within the same factory premises, the credit could not be denied on the basis of the subsequent amendment.
Conclusion: The assessee was eligible for Cenvat credit, and the denial of credit was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: An amendment narrowing the definition of input service operates prospectively unless expressly made retrospective, and credit must be determined under the definition applicable during the relevant period.